Failure to please!
The obligations for a slave to his master are very simple. Among these, he must be totally submissive, unswervingly loyal, obey all commands given to him immediately and without question and devote his life to serving his master and giving him the pleasure that is his due.
The owner of this young pleasure-slave is justifiably angry. Whilst being used sexually, the slave seemed distracted to the point of indifference and failed to please his master. His responses to his master's energetic fucking were lacklustre and unresponsive.
Therefore, it is entirely appropriate for the master to cane the slave for his "failure to please" and to concentrate the pain on his offending ass.
Once he has finished caning the slave, the master will try again and no doubt, that reddened ass will be more "open" to the master's advances.
Source of video unknown: text is mine.
Certainly the “failure to please” his Master is always the worst fault for a pleasure-slave.
ReplyDeleteAnd I certainly well understand the rage of the unsatisfied Master in this post, for the apathetic and unresponsive behavior of this slave-boy while his arse was vigorously fucked by his Master.
However, thinking of male sex-slaves, I have always wondered (I’m talking really) about the EXTREME difficulty in “sexually satisfying their owners” that –at least in some cases- could have experienced not the “passive” slave-boys that (like in this case) were raped in their ass and mouth by masculine Masters ……. but, much much more than these ones, the “difficulty” met by male slaves who were obliged by their owners to give them sexual pleasure in an ACTIVE way, i.e. when the slave was fucking a lascivious Mistress or a lewd effeminate sexually passive Master.
The slave-boys and slave-youths anally and orally fucked by their active Master could always pretend of feeling pleasure and simulate of liking to be fucked ……… but, on the contrary, a young male, especially if he was ordered to fuck an ugly and old Mistress or Master …….. COULDN’T SIMULATE AN ERECTION !!!!!!!!! ….. if he was unable to harden his cock for the excessive disgust !
I very often wondered how many “active” young male slaves were unable, in past, to have hard, potent and long lasting erections as commanded by their lascivious Mistresses and Masters …… and for this, they were most likely ferociously punished, perhaps even subjected to atrocious tortures for “having refused to obey an order” of their omnipotent owner !
Anybody else has ever thought of this very cruel aspect of sexual slavery ?
Karel