Warning





This is an adult site and anyone under the legal age of their respective jurisdiction should leave the blog immediately.


Pictures are sourced from the internet and where possible ownership of them is acknowledged. If you own a picture and want it removed, please contact me.


View my other blog, "Slave himar" at http://slavehimar.bdsmlr.com

Sunday 22 March 2020





Julius Caesar and the Cilician Pirates.

Julius Caesar is one of the towering figures of history and who hasn't heard of him and read of his exploits. He irrevocably changed Rome and was instrumental in establishing a new Imperial era and quite possibly he'd have been Rome's first emperor if he hadn't been assassinated on the floor of the Roman Senate.

Was his assassination necessary is a question I have asked myself a number of times. I am opposed to violence and to capital punishment and in the modern context I would have to say no. 

However, in Caesar's day, the Romans would have seen things from a different perspective to mine. Certainly, Caesar was ambitious and ruthlessly cruel and his treatment of the defeated Gaul tribes and their mass enslavement speaks of his greed and cruelty. To curry favour with the masses, Caesar also sponsored games where many thousands of slaves were killed as entertainment for the populace. His personal ambition new no limits and eventually, his enemies within the Senate were fearful of his dictatorship and decided he must die.

A earlier incident in Caesar's life perhaps gives us an insight into the true nature of the man. 

In the first century BC, the eastern Mediterranean was a lawless area dominated by pirates operating from an area of Anatolia known as Cilicia Trachea (Rough Cilicia). Expediently, the Romans never challenged these pirates who supplied Rome's senators and wealthier citizens with many slaves needed to work their latifundia.

According to Plutarch, in 75BC, twenty-five year old Julius Caesar was travelling to the island of Rhodes to study oratory when he was captured by pirates in the Aegean Sea and held to ransom. The pirates set his ransom at twenty talents. Contemptuously, he laughed at the pirates and told them he was worth fifty talents.

While Caesar waited for the fifty talents to be paid he spent thirty-eight days with the pirates joining in their games and activities, forcing them to listen to his oratory and the poems he wrote and arrogantly assuming the role of their leader. Despite, his seeming good humour, Caesar told the pirates that once the ransom was paid, he would crucify them no doubt much to their amusement. 

When the ransom was paid and he was set free, Caesar held true to his promise. He put together a naval force returned to the pirate stronghold and took the pirates captive. He delivered them to the governor of Asia demanding they be put to death. However, the governor hesitated and growing impatient, Caesar went to the prison were the pirates were being held, seized them and then had them crucified.

To me, this tells much about Julius Caesar; of his overbearing arrogance, his self-belief in his own destiny, his bravery in the face of personal danger, and his need for merciless revenge against his enemies. Perhaps these traits weighed on the minds of his assassins. If so, Julius Caesar was in a way, the author of his own downfall.

The artwork for this post is a taken from a larger work called "Last Rest" by Baron of Prague. However, the text is mine. 

1 comment:

  1. It’s always an extraordinary pleasure, Chris, to read how masterly you are able to present History, keeping the most absolute historical accuracy, but also at the same time, being able to present historical facts in the most fascinating and pleasurable way.
    Your portrait of Julius Caesar, and in particular of his “adventure” with the Cilician Pirates and of his final cruel revenge, is bewitching like a novel, even if it is pure historical facts, correct even to the latest word.
    I fully agree with your human and psychological portrait of this great Roman.
    I have just one observation, if you allow me: it’s obvious and easy to define Caesar as “RUTHLESSLY CRUEL” for his enslavement of really MILLIONS of Gauls …… or for having sponsored Arena games in which many thousands of captives of wars and slaves were barbarically killed for the amusement and entertainment of the Roman populace …….. not only by obliging them to fight as gladiators one against the other or to confront in the arena lions and other wild beasts, but even those war captives and slaves as “unwilling actors” in odious and gruesome sadistic shows in which, with the excuse of staging scenes of mythological stories and tragedies, the slaves were tortured to the death in the arena in the most atrocious ways, among the sadistic excitement of the Romans. E.g. with the excuse of staging the legend of Apollo and Marsyas a strong male captive was slowly skinned alive in the Arena ….. or with the excuse of staging the famous story of the bandit Laureulus, a muscular slave was crucified in the amphitheater on alow X-cross and then a bear was spurred to tear him to pieces and eat him alive ! etc.etc.
    Allow me to observe it’s obvious and easy to define Caesar as “RUTHLESSLY CRUEL” if we judge these bahaviours and facts with a modern mentality and ethics.

    However, perhaps, it would be more “historically correct” to try to judge these behaviours and fact of Caesar by the mentality and ethics of 2,000 years ago.
    It was a fully legal and almost obvious behaviour …. accepted by ALL the peoples of that time, not just by Romans …. to sell into slavery even millions of prisoners of war !
    And it was also a fully legal and almost obvious behaviour …. accepted by ALL the peoples of that time, not just by Romans …. to recognize the full right of the owner of a slave to sentence him to the most atrocious and barbaric tortures ad executions …… even when this was done just for the sadistic amusement and entertainment of the Master and of his friends !
    You also rightly underline that, before the capture of Caesar himself by the Cilician Pirates, no Roman army or military fleet ever fought the pirates that overran all the Mediterranean, not just the coasts of Cilicia …. And this simply because the crews and people captured by pirates , in their raids on ships and along the coasts of many lands, were, after the sale of prisoners of war, the hugest and most profitable source of new slaves for wealthy Roman landowners and tycoons.
    So the ruthless military campaign of Caesar against the Cilician pirates, who had had the bad luck and the naivety of capturing even him …… was only a “personal revenge” dictated by the humiliated haughtiness of the powerful Roman politician.
    After that military campaign and its cruel ending, pirates returned to prosper in all the Mediterranean Sea, as before, fully ignored and unmolested by Roman armies and military fleets …… and their business as slave-hunters and as one of the main suppliers to human-merchandise to the Slave Markets of the Roman world returned to flourish as successful and profitable as never before.

    Karel

    ReplyDelete